Drug Testing For Public Agencies
We expect employees to come to work free of their personal issues. However, a personal struggle as all-consuming as addiction will inevitably spill into the professional realm. That is why it is crucial for employees and supervisors alike to understand how addiction manifests itself in the workplace and to have a thorough knowledge of related city personnel policies.
Personnel policies should begin by emphasizing in positive terms the need for safety in the workplace and adherence to job requirements and work quality, and go on to cite goals such as improving safety and productivity.
When writing or amending policies, cities also need to keep in mind that the laws regarding governmental drug testing policies, unlike for the private sector, place restrictions on who, what, when and how the testing can be done. Governmental employers must have a compelling justification for testing or risk violation of the employee’s Fourth Amendment rights.
Under a city policy, employees can be tested based on reasonable suspicion, post-accident and pre-employment (only after a conditional offer of employment). Random testing, unlike in the private sector, is reserved for those employees who are considered safety-sensitive. These employees have safety-sensitive responsibilities to citizens within the areas of public safety. Examples of such employees include:
Before doing any type of testing, a written policy must be in place and a copy of the policy should be given to all employees at least 60-90 days in advance of the start of testing. This allows any employee with a drug or alcohol addiction to seek rehabilitation. And be certain that all employees sign a receipt of acknowledgement that they have received, understood and agree to abide by the policy.
Your policy must explain how, when, where and for what reason testing may occur and outline the steps that will be taken to ensure employee confidentiality. The records should be stored and locked separately from general employment records with access to these records only on a strict need-to-know basis. It should also explain the consequences of an employee’s refusal to test, interference in the testing process, or a positive test.
In addition, it is important that the policy address federally regulated employees (such as CDL) separately. One of the main differences is the requirement that federally regulated employees are randomly tested in their own separate pool. The federal regulations also require that a Medical Review Officer (MRO) review the drug tests before they are given back to the employer. Even though this is only a requirement for federally regulated employees, it is recommended that an MRO be used for all the city’s drug testing, since they are formally trained and certified.
Lastly, the policy should also set out guidelines for mandatory training for both supervisors and employees. The ability to know the ins and outs of testing can only be ascertained through sufficient training. Remember that lack of knowledge can lead to liability issues that cities cannot afford. KLC provides free training on our website for employees and supervisors that complies with the requirements for federally regulated employees as well as for cities that maintain the certified Kentucky Drug-Free Workplace status through the Kentucky Department of Labor.
A drug and alcohol policy addresses much more than drug-testing in the workplace. An effective policy is a legally compliant policy that provides employee awareness and education, supervisor training and a plan of action. Taken together, it conveys a full, comprehensive program designed specifically to meet the needs of your city and that will set expectations for current and future employees.
For questions on this or other personnel matters, contact Andrea Shindlebower Main, personnel services specialist.
The Kentucky League of Cities serves as the united voice of cities by supporting community innovation, effective leadership and quality governance.
